Elizabeth Woodville And Anne Boleyn - 1747 Words

Women throughout history rarely receive attention for more than superficial causes: their influence on style, manners, or less. However, many women found themselves contributing to the formation of postmodern constructs of marriage for love, partnership, and fidelity. Foremost among these, temporally and popularly, are the examples of Elizabeth Woodville and Anne Boleyn. Undoubtedly, these cases hold great significance to cultural studies of the temporal periods in which the English identify as participants, but they also aid in seeing the eventual popular degradation of women from chaste matrons and aloof maidens to lusty bawds and traitorous whores. By this degradation and extensive primary sources, scholars can easily find these women as examples of the use of one’s image for power in redefining concepts of queenship, and also women who set the standard to view the gradual combination of partner and lover in understanding social history. Aristocratic women in the Court syst em as a whole find relatively little attention by the most popular works on its culture. David Starkey , Alison Weir , and David Gunn , even though they offer insights on topic largely relegated to popular histories and romances; women, in fact, receive little merit for their Courtly careers. Yet, it is important to recognize that the late medieval and Tudor Court offered an increasing number of roles for women to fill, as well as, a semblance of stability. The key to the ability for young women toShow MoreRelatedAnne s Uncanny Similarities Of Henry Viii1344 Words   |  6 Pagesmistress and wife in her reign In conjunction with radical laws and policies, Anne’s tenure as Queen also shows new religious involvement. Former queens, like Catherine, focused on self-improvement, alms, women’s issues, Catholic rites, and prayer. Anne adopted these aspects and more. Her preferred religious activities focused on education. Her circulation of translated religious texts and the New Testament; dictation of high standards of behavior similar to Vives’ instructions; and worked to aidRead MoreAnne Boleyn - Paper1823 Words   |  8 PagesAnne Boleyn lived a strategic lifestyle in the English court of Henry VIII. As a pawn of her family, she went from a small girl in the French court to the queen. Henry had an obsession with Anne and would stop at nothing until they were together causing many long term affects on England. Many people had different contrasting views of Anne Boleyn; on one hand she was viewed as a jezebel or concubine by the Catholics but at the same time she was viewed as a saintly queen by protestant writers. BothRead MoreLiterary Aspects Of Annes S2041 Words   |  9 Pagesturns to her two extant portraits. Holbein’s portrayals of the smirking young woman proves the commissioner’s idealized lady, as well as what they desired to show her as. This destruction of items relating to her time as Queen leads any examination of Anne to rely on what is known, rather than what would successfully relate her to her peers throughout history, in order to determine her role in ruling. Continuing from the literary aspects of Anne’s life, the scholar finds the physical remnants, two paintings

Cultural Relativism Is Important For Many Reasons

Cultural Relativism is defined as, â€Å"The principle that an individual s beliefs and activities should be understood by others in terms of that individual s own culture†. Wilson talked about this term extensively in his class and he noticed a common trend within his classroom. The trend was that his students warned him, â€Å"Not to be judgmental or to impose your values on other people.†(Soccio 2007). This is a common trend found with a lot of people in my opinion. In fact, I have the same belief as many of Wilson’s students. Cultural relativism is important for many reasons. First, having a sense of cultural relativism provides people with a form of tolerance towards other cultures. Second, it helps people understand acts or actions†¦show more content†¦When these two cultures were told any other way of disposing of their dead, they were completely shocked and almost disgusted (Rachels 2015). This helps support the fact that different cultures have different practices and therefore different moral codes. Furthermore, if different cultures have different moral codes and practices that are based on their own personal culture, another culture should not be able to judge them, simply because they are unique to that culture. Tolerance is another good quality that comes with cultural relativism. Tolerance helps us have a sort of explanation on why other cultures act the way they do. It gives the reason of an action or act being based on one’s culture rather than because of the type of individual that they are. Take a cultural group such as the Eskimos. The Eskimos believe in and practice infanticide throughout their villages (Rachels 2015). This practice is considered highly wrong in American cultures, but is considered morally acceptable in cultures like the Eskimo (Rachels 2015). What a lot of people forget to take into account is the reason the Eskimos perform infanticide. It is not because they are cruel people, no, it is because they are thinking about the possible future life of the child and the future life of their village. Another baby is simply another mouth to feed, a task which can be difficult for some Eskimo families. Therefore, in order to prevent a bad life for the babyShow MoreRelatedCultural Relativism : The Moral Code Of A Culture1470 Words   |  6 PagesCultural relativism is self-explanatory in its name but goes deeper beyond that. Cultural relativism states that standards are relative to one’s culture. There are no standards of morality shared by all societies; all rules are controlled by the society in which a person lives. If the moral code of a culture says that an action is right than according to those standards, the action is right. If the society says that a certain action is wrong, without any input from other cultures, the action is wrongRead MoreCultural Relativism And Anti Foundationalism1556 Words   |  7 Pagesseeks to explore the concept of cultural re lativism and anti-foundationalism in philosophy. Cultural Relativism is a philosophical doctrine that makes the claim that moral or ethical systems, which vary from culture to culture, are relative to culture and therefore equally valid. This is the chief argument to support the anti-foundationalist view of the pre-Socratic era that denies the possibility of an ethical or moral foundation, because of the multitude of cultural differences in ethical valuesRead MoreDifferences And Cultural Differences1275 Words   |  6 Pagesargument of Cultural Differences and how it is not a viable defense for Moral Relativism. First, I will explain what Moral Relativism is. Then, I will give examples of cultural differences that support Moral Relativism and state what the Cultural Differences Argument is. After this, I will point out why Rachels believe the argument is flawed and the proof he provides to back up his belief. Next, I will discuss how Moral Relativism is false for other reasons, as well, and not just the reason that RachelsRead MoreThe Challenges Of Cultural Relativism And Ethical Egoism1659 Words   |  7 PagesChallenges of Cultural Relativism† and â€Å"Ethical Egoism.† There is an important distinction that can be made between cultural moral relativism and individual moral relativism, but ultimately their meanings rejoin. The distinction does allow individual moral relativism to be compared to ethical egoism. Both theories begin by being centered around the individual, before they diverge in important ways. By exploring the way individual moral relativism compares with cultural moral relativism and moral egoismRead MoreMoral Relativism : Morality And War879 Words   |  4 PagesMoral Relativism Debate Moral relativism is the idea that there is no absolute moral standard that is applicable to any person at any place at any given time. It suggests that there are situations in which certain behavior that would normally be considered â€Å"wrong† can actually be considered â€Å"right†. Moral relativism has played an increasingly significant role in today’s society, particularly regarding the differences between the countries of the world. This essay will summarize and explain bothRead MoreETHICAL (MORAL) RELATIVISM Essay1022 Words   |  5 Pagesï » ¿RUNNING HEADING: ETHICAL (MORAL) RELATIVISM Ethical (Moral) Relativism Exploring Kohlberg’s stance on Ethical Relativism JebbehG Ethics in Contemporary Society | PHI101 A01 July 17, 2013 Introduction Presently, Americans are comfortable relating ethics to individuality. Often times, American citizens expresses their right of freedoms to enhance their own sense of ethics or relativity. In defining relativism, moral principles are a matter of personal feelings andRead MoreCultural Relativism1386 Words   |  6 PagesJames Rachels essay titled The Challenge of Cultural Relativism is more of a critique over what philosophers call Cultural Relativism. A theory in which states that there is no real sense of morality and that it is one’s own culture that makes up their own morality. A lot of people tend to reason things in the way that Cultural Relativists might, by saying things such as â€Å"Oh, well it’s what that culture does. It’s okay that they’re doing that† however, sometimes people think the opposite â€Å"No, itRead MoreCultural Relativism And Racial Relativism Essay1169 Words   |  5 PagesQuestion 1 Cultural Relativism is a theory arguing that each different society follows a different moral code that is created by the majority and that is completely right and acceptable. A moral code is right, not because of any moral reason, but because a specific culture says it is. It is important to understand that Cultural Relativists believe that each group has the right moral code for themselves, even if there are contradictory moral codes in different societies. In James Rachels’ articleRead MoreCultural Relativism Is Not Ideal1677 Words   |  7 Pages Cultural Relativism is not Ideal In The Challenge of Cultural Relativism, James Rachel’s main argument is that cultural relativism is not creditable, but the whole theory of what cultural relativists believe, isn’t completely incorrect. Cultural relativism is the theory that beliefs, activities, and most values are based on the person’s culture. In other words, right and wrong is different in each culture. I agree with James Rachel on his view of cultural relativism because he has very good reasonsRead MoreEthical Relativism Is An Unsound And Unreliable Ethical Philosophy1742 Words   |  7 Pages Ethical Relativism is an unsound and unreliable ethical philosophy Mohammed Jweihan Ethics for a Global Economy Ethical Relativism is an unsound and unreliable ethical philosophy Cultural and ethical relativisms are widely used theories that explain differences among cultures and their ethics and morals. Morality deals with individual character and the moral rules that are meant to govern and limit one’s character. On the other hand Ethics is somewhat interchangeable with morals

Critical Essay On The Pedestrian Used A free essay sample

Critical Essay On The Pedestrian ( Used A Lot In England ) Essay, Research Paper Critical essay Fifty-three old ages from now a author is taken to a psychiatric Centre for aid because he was walking along the streets. In this essay I will be sing the image of the hereafter created in this short narrative by analyzing the secret plan, puting, character and subject. This short narrative is about a adult male called Leonard Mead who goes for a quiet amble on a brumous eventide at eight Os clock. He stops at the corner of an intersection, equals down and chooses which route he wants to take. Mr Leonard Mead had done this every dark for 10 old ages. Sometimes he would travel out and non return until after 12. The unusual thing is that he has non met anybody in the street for the last 10 old ages, but by pure happenstance, the lone constabulary auto in the metropolis of three million happened to halt him that dark. We will write a custom essay sample on Critical Essay On The Pedestrian Used A or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page The constabulary auto interrogates him as to why he is walking the streets and inquiries him about his profession and matrimonial position. The auto can non believe that he is merely walking for air and merely to see. The auto tells Leonard to acquire in and he does. Mr Mead assumes that he will be taken place but when he is in the auto and the doors locked shut he asks where he is being taken, the auto he replies to the psychiatric Centre for research on regressive inclinations. Leonard Mead is non a normal individual in the manner that his neighbors are, because all they do is sit all dark with their lazy eyes glued to the telecasting. Leonard is a author in a non-reading society. Peoples neer read books, all they do is watch telecasting and that is likely the ground why he has non met anybody on the streets in the last 10 old ages. Leonard seems to hold a critical attitude to all his neighbors being so unsociable. He is considered unnatural by the constabulary auto because he does non hold a screening screen and he does non hold a married woman. The other character in the narrative is the constabulary auto that stops him. The auto is a automaton auto without anybody inside it and it seems to be acquiring its orders from an outside beginning. The narrative is set in the hereafter in the twelvemonth 2052 in a metropolis of three million. It is a cold November eventide and Leonard Mead is foremost introduced at eight Os clock. The metropolis seems like a shade town, even Leonard describes the topographic point as a cemetery. The writer introduced Leonard at eight Os clock because it is a clip when people are usually outside, so thi s makes it look even more obvious that no 1 is on the streets. The clasping concrete walls and grassy seams give the feeling of a barren. The writer gives a intimation of enigma by rearranging the words at the beginning of the narrative, he gives the feeling that the universe is a lonely and barbarous topographic point, # 8216 ; he was entirely or every bit good as entirely. The writer besides sets the clip in November when it is cold so the trail of frigid air increases the eiry feeling. He uses similes to do the vicinity seem as if it is dead, it was non unlike walking through a cemetery or there were rustles and mutters where a window in a grave like edifice was still unfastened. The writer makes the neighbors seem as if they are dead because they do non socialize or hold involvements in the outside universe. This gives the feeling that the hereafter will be black and the general populations are moving like living deads. For long ago he had sagely changed to gym shoes when strolling, because the Canis familiariss in intermittent squad. These words suggest that he shouldn t be on the streets and there is some danger involved. He pretends to inquire what is on telecasting in a joking sort of mode, which indicates that he dislikes everyone being cooped up whith their eyes on the screen. The writer makes the topographic point seem like it deserted ; but now these main roads were similar watercourses in a dry season, all rock and Moon glow. What are you making out says the constabulary auto wonderingly as if he s perpetrating a offense. Walking Mead answers Walking where, for what as if it s an unnatural activity. And do you non hold a sing screen in you re house to see with? as if you do non necessitate to see things in world, you merely utilize the telecasting. When the constabulary auto asks for his profession Mr Mead answers that he is a author. The auto responds that this is no profession. I think that the ground that the auto took Leonard to the psychiatric Centre because a author would be a menace to governmental control. This is because authors have a graphic imaginativeness and would oppugn the system. I think the subject of this piece is that the hereafter will be a black and cheerless topographic point where practical world will be the lone beginning of amusement. It is besides about how authorities wants supreme control and attempts to stomp out anybody with the ability to overturn them. An illustration of this is Leonard, who shows individualism and is taken away to the psychiatric Centre.

Shakespeare Fact Or Fiction Essays - William Shakespeare

Shakespeare: Fact Or Fiction? Shakespeare: Fact Or Fiction? Was the man we know as Shakespeare really the author of the Shakespearean Works? We know little about the man called Shakespeare, Did he really write the plays, or is he just a man that got confused within history? (Sobran 44) There is not even a correct spelling of this mans name, Some of the spellings include Shakspere, Shakespeare, And Shaxpere. Shakespeare, Is it the man, Or is it another? (Hayes 1D) Shakespeare is both fact and fiction, he was no concern until nearly two hundred years after he perished, and there is still no definite or probably will there ever be a conclusion to this mystery. (Sobran 44) There is another man that can be attributed with the works of Shakespeare, His name is Edward DeVere, the 17th Earl of Oxford. (Bethell 47) The man known as Shakespeare does not fit perfectly into the necessary criteria to determine the author of these works. Thomas Looney invented a series of criteria that had to be filled, in order to be a possible candidate for the authorshi p of the Shakespearean works. To have all the knowledge that is portrayed in the works, the author must have accomplished many things. These including a superior education, from what we know of Shakespeare, this was not a possibility.(Bethell 46) We do not even know if Shakespeare has ever written anything in his life, Nor do we know that he was paid for writing these works. The man Shakespeare does not even make a claim that he is the author.(Bethell 50) He may not have been able to write the simplest thing of all, His own name.(Hayes 1D) Last Name 2 Its not how little we know about Shakespeare that causes confusion and difficulty, Its the things that we do know about this man that cause the confusion and difficulty. We know Shakespears father, a glover, could not write. When he signed documents, he simply made an X , This is why it is beleived that Shakespeare could not write also, Because he probably did not attend school therefore his education was passed down from his father. ( Bethell 48) We do know much more about the man Edward DeVere. We know that because deVere was a nobleman, he could not have his name written upon his writings because he would be considered of a lower class. The plays contain a sense of hate towards some of the noblemen of that time period, which also point the authorship towards DeVere. (Hayes 1D) When DeVere was a young man, he spent a lot of time in Italy and Europe, This could explain the great detail used in the Shakespearean plays of Venice, and other European locations.(Sobran 45) The sonnets have never been able to fit into Shakespears life, On the other hand they fit into DeVere's life well. (Sobran 45) There are facts that lean both ways in this age old mystery of authorship, Though the Strafordian man does not fit into the story very well, He may have some advantages that the Oxfordian man may not. DeVere on the other hand, has mostly every fact pointing towards him as the valid author for the Shakespearean works, From hi s education, to his experiences, to his travel. The Oxfordian seems to come out on top. Shakespeare: Stratforidan, or DeVere? Shakespeare